The Immoderate Blog

Hate in an Obamanation

The leftist demagogues require hate to advance the class warfare that occupies the central space in their agenda. The hate that Obama and his ilk can foster toward a variety of evil and undeserving portions of the population (for example: self-made successful people) is a good hate in the not quite Newspeak of this era. In fact, this type of hate (actual hate) is not considered hate, instead it is viewed as compassion. In this brave new world "hate" has a new composition. Only in a fledgling Utopia such as our glorious Obamanation does "hate" attain so many new and diverse meanings. Here is a partial list of the Obamaspeak definitions of "hate":

• The desire to have federal and local governments adhere to their respective constitutions or charters.
• The act of discussing the past actions, associations, and words of President Obama or any public figure who shares his desire to "change" the greatest nation on Earth into a replication of a lesser nation.
• Any acknowledgment of the value of innocent life.
• Vocal opposition of forcible redistribution of wealth from the earner to the dependent voting block (funneled through various government agencies.)
• Any desire to see our immigration laws enforced or a belief that immigrants who followed the legal process should not be punished for the sake of gaining favor with the victim illegal alien voting block.
• Illustration of the advances of adult stem cell or umbilical cord blood stem cell research because unlike embryonic stem cell research, they show promise and also unlike embryonic stem cell research, they do not further the abortion agenda.
• An honest assessment of  constituent pay-off plans such as FOCA, EFCA, or Cap and Trade.
• Opposition to culling the herd through "healthcare reform."
• Any replaying of President Obama off "TOTUS", as an unscripted moment shines too much sunlight on the "substance" and incoherence of the man who represents "hope" to millions of drones.
• The act of pointing out that the bloated and wasteful government can not be trusted with even more control over the lives of citizens.

I contend that one of the best indicators of accuracy is to have one's words referred to as "hate-filled" by an Obama supporter. This hyphenated word is meant to intimidate opposition, but instead provides affirmation given the Obammunists' definitions of the word "hate."

We Need a "Party of NO!"

The mascot of the Democratic party is an ass, which MSN Encarta defines in part as:

Ass, also known as a donkey, long-eared mammal related to the horse

Given the words and actions of the leader of the Democrat Party, and unfortunately of our imperiled nation, I believe this picture could accompany the above definition. This face is more than a symbol for the Democrat Party, it is also a symbol of why we need a "party of no." There have been recent whining columns and lecturing monologues devoted to admonishing the Republican Party that being the "party of no" is not the way to go. I suspect that many of the lecturers are comfortable with a liberal governing style or at least believe that the key to winning is to promise lottery jackpots to the same groups that are courted by the masters of class warfare in the Democrat Party. It would appear that saying no to government intrusion, massive wealth redistribution, oppressive taxation, the killing of industry, and the weakening of our security equates to not having ideas! I would suggest that a "party of no" is not a party without ideas, but a party that has its priorities in order! Not that "no" should always be the answer, however, in the current political Hell, "no" must be said first to combat the encroachment. The unfortunately elected reader of TOTUS has an ideology based agenda formed through indoctrination and has never had to be tempered by actually earning a living in the other than political world. The Chicago activist days were nothing more than political stepping stones... he is not from Chicago, he moved there for the sake of political expediency. Now he spews forth grand ideas designed to spread the misery and equalize outcomes. He uses the bully pulpit to force a radical agenda down the collective throat of a nation. To complain that Republicans should not just say "no" is to accept that the party must enter into the give away game. It is to accept that our society has degraded so far that we are not capable of making individual decisions, of caring for ourselves, or of charitable giving. It is to assert that individual citizens are not smart enough to control their destinies. If some lib were to propose a "cap and trade" scheme to cripple industry and redistribute wealth globally for the sake of punishing emitters of the gas humans naturally exhale and that plants need to live, we would require a "party of NO!" Imagine if some libiot were to propose legislation that forced those who preserve life to instead take it or made it legally acceptable to dismember and remove a full term baby from his mother's womb or legalized the practice of killing the child of a child without notifying the parents of the pregnant child, we would require a "party of NO!" By the way, the sickness of the libiot is displayed in these assaults on parental notification. Parental consent is required to go on a field trip or play a sport, but not to undergo the baby butchering procedure? Say some libtard floated a big labor pay-off plan to eliminate the use of private ballots in the decision to unionize and harm a company, we would need a "party of NO!" What if a powerful lib teleprompter reader wanted to control the salaries of private business executives? Can I get a "party of NO?" Pretend some really stupid, yet powerful libs desired to ruin the health care of Canadians by making health care in our country an imitation of theirs, complete with rationing and ridiculously long waiting lists, thus depriving them a free country to visit when they need a medical procedure. Pretend that this dastardly nationalization of health care wasn't just intended to keep Canadians out of our country, but would also be thrust upon the majority of we citizens! We would require a "party of HELL NO" to tell the libtard elite that the citizens of this country will not be forced into a health care system that doesn't work, that has some board of bureaucrats deciding whose life is worthy of sparing, and that drives medical professionals to seek other lines of work while they and their comfortably wealthy friends can afford medical tourism and other methods of private care. When the governing party proposes anything that does not fall within the established guidelines of its particular level of government, we need a "party of NO." When the libiots attempt to create more victims and therefore dependents in order to gain a permanent iron fisted majority, we need a "party of NO!" When Barack Obama and his leftist ilk seek to suppress the voices of dissent and turn this great nation into Cuba or Venezuala, we need a "party of NO!" Note to RINO's and "reformers" please fell free to whine or , better yet, join the party that fits your agenda.

Unholy '09

An unholy alliance, geared toward the complete degradation of our free nation, is being formed according to Politico. The coalition of societal carcinogens is actually called "Unity '09" but of course Unholy '09 is much more fitting given the members and its agenda. From the Politico piece:

A broad coalition of left-leaning groups is quietly closing ranks into a new coalition, "Unity '09," aimed at helping President Barack Obama push his agenda through Congress. Conceived at a New York meeting before the November election, two Democrats familiar with the planning said, Unity '09 will draw together money and grassroots organizations to pressure lawmakers in their home states to back White House legislation and other progressive causes.

The destructive alliance reads like a police line-up of organizations that exist to further prod our nation toward Socialism, destroy innocent life, degrade our society, silence honest voices, and punish success. This foul gathering consists of:

• MoveOn.org
• ACLU
• La Raza
• Planned Parenthood
• labor unions
• environmentalist nuts

Barack Obama's agenda is nothing more than a dangerous homage to these leftist parasites so it is fitting that they would ban together to ram the ruination of our society through Congress. This should be cause for outrage and alarm given the terrifying fact that Obama has already begun the process of implementing so much of his hopeful "change" (or as Americans call it redistributive punishment.) Imagine the frenetic pace at which this teleprompted fool has already issued or rescinded executive orders, initiated unprecedented government intrusions, and damaged a fragile economy... multipLIED by the coordinated efforts of the well-funded propagandists listed above! There is a very real justification for alarm. This is not a time for RINO "reformers" or moderate weenies to sell their wares to The Republican Party. This is not a time for messages of softening values or acceptance of the principles espoused by this unholy alliance. Once again, so that even Meghan McCain or David Frum might be able to understand it, The Democrats already have the Unholy '09 market cornered!

We need Obama to succeed!

I have, over the past few weeks, seen the error of my ways. I have witnessed the fiery wrath brought upon any who dare voice dissent with regards to the new administration and the path on which it would place this nation. I now know that the ideas of fairness, equality, justice, hope, and change transcend political ideology and can be realized if we, as a collective come together to support our president. I want President Obama to succeed because I am tired. Having to get up and go to work every weekday morning wears on a person. The "progressive" cuts at my place of employment are evidence of of the "hope" President Obama's plans for economic and environmental "justice" can inspire. My former co-workers can now sleep late on a Monday morning, resting comfortably with the knowledge that given a chance to succeed, President Obama's economic message will enable the majority of their former peers to be able to catch up on their sleep. In addition to being tired, I know that I have been living the life of the sucker, who works for a living and believes that a person can be responsible for himself and his family. What a dumbass! Obviously I should be dependent upon government to decide my future and control my destiny. I have learned that the wage earner is evil if said earner does not belong to a labor union, isn't in a government job, or isn't in the entertainment industry. I don't want to be evil! I do not deserve a wage beyond that which meets my basic needs and perhaps a subsidy for the needs of my family. I should give up my cares to the state. I need Obama to succeed because it is only "fair" that we as ugly Americans do not consume more resources (thank you Mark Levin for reminding us of "The One's" moving campaign speech) than those in lesser developed regions of the world. The same type of "fairness" should be applied via government mandate such that there is income equality. Of course I do not seek income equality based on skill or contribution, that is the archaic way! That is not "change!" I seek income equality based on... nothing but pure "fairness." I am a person and therefore I do not deserve to earn more than another person. After all, its not like I'm a member of the liberal elite. I need President Obama to succeed so that my children (which I should not have fathered, but hadn't been enlightened by the glow of his emminence Obama) can grow into productive party members and have a "green" planet to inherit. Our children should not be drawn to material wealth, unless they are the children of the liberal elite. Our children should be raised in the natural way... without using electricity or indoor plumbing. Our children should worship Al Gore as a prophet of the eco-gods and should pray an Inconvenient Truth. We should teach our children to forego square meals (because some might be starving) and use only one square per dirt toilet visit. We need President Obama to succeed because there can never be too much government regulation and the only way jobs can truly be "created or saved" is by implementing such restrictive and "progressive" regulations that private business cannot survive. In this brilliant and "fair" plan, we can eventually work for the one great entity and we can do our part. We want to do our part, don't we? We want to produce or give according to our ability and receive based on our need.(Uncle Karl would be proud... as would Nikita Kruschev.) We need healthcare reform and we need Barack Obama to do it now before, as Tom Daschle warned in his book, the honeymoon wears off and people lose the afterglow of this "historic" election.  We need this healthcare reform to control immigration and save our planet. Sound far-fetched? Our new healthcare system will rival that of other nations and therefore there will be no reason for citizens of those nations to flee to our country to receive care. The elderly, the disabled, and others that cannot contribute to the cause will not be treated in a timely manner according to quality of life calculations, so we can have a greener future with less people leeching off Mother Earth and expelling the filthy (yet plant feeding, oh well to Hell with the plants) carbon dioxide. People, we need Barack Obama to succeed! To wish otherwise would just plain make sense!

What's with Obama's hatred of the unborn?

I realize that it isn't just the unborn that have been targeted by Barack Obama's radical anti-life fetish, as was evidenced in his Illinois State Senate stand against the Born Alive Protection Act (The transcript of the 82nd Legislative Day of The State of Illinois 92nd General Assembly (pp 31-35)), but fortunately he hasn't had a recent opportunity to advocate for the death of the recently born. So now the most ardent supporter of the slaughter of the innocent to ever occupy The Oval Office is delivering blow after blow to the unborn and the decent human beings that value innocent lives. What could Barack "Born Alive, Let Them Die" Obama possibly do to maintain the NARAL ingratiating momentum he ramped up by rescinding The Mexico City Policy and nominating The Governor of Death Kathleen Sebelius to be Secretary of Health and Inhuman Services? On Monday the nation's Abortion Promoter In Chief will order a surge in his war on the unborn by signing an order to use federal funds to perform experiments on human embryos.  As The LA Times rejoices:

Obama to reverse embryonic stem cell research policy

Lifting Bush's limits on research will reopen a door for science.

By Karen Kaplan and Noam N. Levey March 7, 2009

Reporting from Washington and Los Angeles -- Making good on a popular campaign pledge, President Obama will sign an executive order Monday rescinding restrictions on federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research, administration officials said Friday -- instantly making hundreds of millions of new dollars available for the controversial science. President Bush had limited the use of funding from the National Institutes of Health and other government agencies to a handful of cell lines created with private money before August 2001 so that taxpayers would not have to pay for the sacrifice of embryos, viewed by some social conservatives as tantamount to murder.

The signing is expected to take place during an event intended to highlight the importance of "sound science" in government policymaking, according to one official who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

The irony is nauseating. There is no way in which a reasonable person would believe that this atrocity has anything to do with highlighting "the importance of 'sound science' in government policymaking" given the advances of adult stem cell research and Obama's intention to remove many treatment options from all but the wealthy elites in this country.  Barack Obama plans to control the healthcare of average Americans in his almighty benevolence so we can look forward to stories like these (hat tip: Mark Levin) from media outlets that shy away from peddling his propaganda. This leftist jerk is going to destroy healthcare in this nation for the sake of his ideology and lust for total power, yet the ignorant populace is expected believe he would turn human embryos into taxpayer funded playthings for immoral "scientists" for the sake of health? This move is nothing more than a vile bow to the anti-life groups that he relies uppon so heavily for financial and rabid support in his many campaigns. Perhaps he will jet across the nation and have an elaborate signing ceremony in some libiot cesspool such as San Francisco on Monday. The same Hollywood dimwits that ignore Barry's carbon footprint but order average Americans to abstain from driving can come out and cheer his bold move to sacrifice these embryos to the liberal gods all in the name of "science." Quick question to all you supporters of this president's plans to restrict healthcare: Do your elderly relatives know that you are supporting the denial of their care?

Obama Has No Shame

I was just walking through the cafeteria during my lunch hour and on the television, as is common in this era of egomaniacal leadership, was "Big Brother" Barack Obama. I know he seems to have some sort of psychiatric affliction that drives him to aspire to be on every telescreen (sorry, he doesn't actually have us at that point... yet) or television at all times. The blurb below his smug upper body read something along the lines of "President Obama says companies are shipping jobs overseas or shutting down." The shameless part of this most recent bit of theater is that he is apparently talking about the supposed 'healthcare crisis.' You know, the one we must fix now, before his plans draw too much reasonable scrutiny. I hope I am wrong in my assumption that he was linking healthcare to the loss of jobs. I hope he isn't actually the despicable liar I believe him to be. Can you imagine the "audacity" of his dishonest show if my assumption was correct? His American liberty destroying base and its varying groups of libtard special interests do everything in their power to kill business in the name of "the people" and he is going to use this to argue for ruining American healthcare for the sake of centralized power? What do labor unions, environmentalist nutjobs, slip and fall John Edwards style ambulance chasers, and "community  organizers" have in common? They all work to kill business in some fashion. The union monstrosity is obvious, but of course that won't stop their Barry from paying them off with support for "card check." These production prevention organizations artificially inflate wages and hold companies hostage to demands that eventually cross the threshold of it being worth maintaining the business, at least in its current location. Barack will see that unions are allowed to do to other states what they have done to places like Michigan. St. Barack defers to the eco-crazies with crap and trade schemes for wealth redistribution and manufacturing hampering. This is a man who wants plug-in cars, but nothing to power them. This is a man who seeks to further handcuff the automotive industry by dictating what they will build. If this disingenuous "leader" was sincere perhaps he would travel a Hell of a lot less! These vermin would have us ignore the impact of medical malpractice lawsuits on the cost of health insurance. The parasitic lawyers are too important a group of campaign donors to be a part of the problem. Instead of blaming the spirit channeling adulterer and his litigating ilk, the focus is on how the famously efficient federal government can better care for the health needs of its subjects (oh yes these people would have us be subjects.) Just don't get too old, or have any condition that might limit your capacity for contributing to the collective, otherwise your health and any care it may require will be given low priority in Barry's Brave New World!

Biden Gets Something Right!

Alright, I admit that I never expected to write a word of acknowledgment related to Vice President Joe Biden having made an accurate statement. I was shocked when I read a stunningly honest Biden quote this afternoon in an AP article on The Telegraph web site. The content of the article was alarming, at least to anyone that isn't in favor of intimidation and thuggish tactics being employed to spread the cancer of unionization courtesy of the "card check" union pay-off legislation. The headline "Maverick Specter's toughest vote could be ahead," might be the AP's way of warning John McCain that if he doesn't fall back in line, he could be replaced as the "maverick." In other words, McCain better not pull what he did during the Obamulus battle (stand for what is right) and behave more like he did during Hillary Clinton's confirmation process. This article focuses on Senator Arlen Specter (RINO - PA) and the possibility of his once again playing the role of liberal lapdog/sanity spoiler when the inappropriately named "Employee Free Choice Act" or card check comes up for a vote. From the article:

At a reception Friday in Philadelphia with Pennsylvania's congressional delegation, Vice President Joe Biden thanked Specter for supporting the stimulus bill.

"He knows what's worth losing over and he's willing to act on it," Biden said. "In his heart, I know he's a Democrat."

The card check legislation could be a defining issue for Specter's reputation: It is a top priority for labor unions and has solid opposition from business groups, which were divided over the stimulus bill.

"I think the vote for the stimulus will pale in comparison to the card check," said G. Terry Madonna, director of the Center for Opinion Research at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster.

In 2007, the card check bill passed the House with only 13 Republicans supporting it. In the Senate, Specter was the only Republican to vote with Democrats to force debate on the legislation, even though the bill had insufficient votes to advance and President George Bush had promised to veto it.

Your eyes did not deceive you, Biden made a true statement! "In his heart, I know he's a Democrat." I'm sure Biden might have given Specter a friendly wink if this action hadn't been surgically rendered impossible. With the media buttering up the RINO triplets Specter, Snowe, and Collins, who knows what the libiots in power will be able force upon our nation. Today, egregious and wasteful spending. Tomorrow, the elimination of private ballot votes to unionize. What other horrors await? If you wan't to lighten your mood, I suggest you visit Ironic Surrealism and take a look at this clip of Barry, Hillary, Michelle, and Joe celebrating the twilight of a great nation.

Kathleen Parker's Lament: Jindal Isn't Obama

Before we know it, Kathleen Parker will be working for The Washington Obamost and taking turns with Eli Saslow (official WaPo Barackophile) writing puff tributes to the former occupant of the fictional Office of the President-elect. For those of you that aren't familiar with the cotton candy and butterfly kisses Saslow regularly sends to "Big Brother" Barry in the pages of the Obamost, I refer you to today's ridiculous entry, "Obama, Reaching Outside the Bubble." It is a heroic account of how Barry The Magnificent endures the the torture of his limited freedom as El Presidente.

"People don't understand what it's like to be trapped within four walls that happen to be called the White House," said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), who has spoken with Obama about his new life. "Barack is determined not to be engulfed in the bubble, because part of his own analysis is that's what happened to his predecessor. He knows it's easy to become a prisoner of these things and become totally cut off."

Of course Saslow refrains from offering the obvious and simple solution to Obama's not-so-private Hell, resignation. Coincidentally, the solution to Barry's torture, which he sought so avidly and the media aided in so dishonestly,  is the solution to one of America's biggest problems. Barring the fleeting hope that President Obama will seek a return to the freedom he enjoyed pre-inauguration, Townhall's Kathleen Parker has decided that Eli Saslow needs competition from a "conservative." Any Republican she sees as a threat to her Barry is to be compared to her Barry and disparaged in the process. You may be wondering how anyone could be disparaged by comparison to Barack Obama. If the comparison was substantive, there would be no comparison given Obama's complete lack of substance. Kooky Kathleen prefers to draw comparisons based on how the Republican threat might be viewed by elitist snobs such as those in attendance at Barack Obama's under-reported San Francisco fundraiser at which he enthralled the caviar crowd with the following assessment of the little people:

"Our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there's not evidence of that in their daily lives," he said. "You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has joined Alaska Governor Sarah Palin in Parker's sights. It appears Governor Jindal's response to "Big Brother" Barry's pretend State Of The Union address has presented her the opportunity to pounce. Mrs. Parker actually has a lot of good things to say about Governor Jindal, when she's not insulting average Americans. Kathleen Parker : Where's Bobby? - Townhall.com:

The Jindal who responded to Barack Obama's address to Congress was less the brilliant statesman than a terribly mixed metaphor -- equal parts Mister Rogers, Bobby Brady and Kenneth the Page. I know Bobby Jindal, and that guy wasn't Bobby Jindal.

But Kathleen has hope for Governor Jindal:

It's a shame that Tuesday was Jindal's first introduction to many Americans, who won't have a clear picture of the man. It's also a shame he and Obama aren't on the same team. Although they differ strenuously on social issues and the role government should play in problem-solving, they are temperamentally similar. Most important, both are pragmatists who promise to seek solutions that work, rather than be bound by ideology. It would be heartening to watch these two serious thinkers craft real bipartisan solutions to our economic troubles. One can fantasize. At just 37, Jindal needs seasoning, but again, like Obama, he's a quick study. Lesson No. 1: Governor, fire your staff and retool. A majority of Americans have demonstrated that they'll vote for the smart guy, even if he talks too fast.

Governor Jindal has been put on Parker notice. He is better than the run of the mill common sense American! He must speak in haughty tones and ingratiate himself with high society in order to live up to the standard, Barack Obama. Only then will he be worthy of consideration for Kathleen "The Voice of Champagne Conservatism" Parker's all-important endorsement. It is all about presentation and style. "Stage-crafting", which was actually part of her assessment takes precedence over issues. Parker must have loved those columns in Denver and how dare Sarah Palin mention them? If Gov. Jindal heeds Mrs. Parker's warning and becomes a socialite Republican parrot for Obammunism, he may find himself the object of Eli Saslow drool fests. If not, at least Mrs. Parker might be able to disparage him and common sense citizens to the point at which she is offered a position of (dis)honor at The Huffington Post.